I've been thinking about writing something on gun control for awhile now, I finally decided to put fingers to keyboard and make it happen. Gun control has once again become a hot topic of debate since the tragedy at Sandy Hook elementary in which twenty children and six adults were fatally shot. The Obama administration, never letting a good crisis go to waste, was quick to ride the wave of emotionalism to purpose sweeping firearms reform. President Obama in his speech at the Sandy Hook prayer vigil asked "Can we honestly say that we're doing enough to keep our children — all of them — safe from harm?" I'm inclined to believe that if Mr. Obama really cared about keeping children safe he wouldn't support abortion in the first place. But I digress, on to gun control...

While the those that support gun control have good intentions, it is based upon two assumptions that are both false. The first assumption is that gun control works. Past gun control attempts have shown that gun control is only effective in disarming law abiding citizens, it is not true for criminals who disregard the law anyways. For example in 1976 Washington DC passed a strict gun law that prohibited handguns and required all firearms in private homes to be kept unloaded and temporarily rendered inoperable. The result was a 73% increase in homicides in DC while the US murder rate averaged 11% lower. Across the border, Mexico has some of the strictest gun controls on the planet. Guns are generally restricted to the authorities and there is only one shop in Mexico that legally sells (low-powered) firearms and getting one for the average citizen is a lengthy process. This however has not stopped the drug cartels from obtaining assault weapons and running rampant. As long as there is a need for it there will be a black market to supply it. If making something illegal was effective in controlling it's use then we would not have a war on drugs.

The second assumption is that less damage can be inflected without guns. Two of the worst terrorists attacks on US soil didn't involve guns at all. Timothy McVeigh used a fertilizer bomb to blow up the Oklahoma City Building killing 168 people and injuring over 800. The 9/11 terrorists used box cutters and planes to kill over 3000 Americans. Last year a man in China used a knife to wound 22 kids. A couple months before that another man in China used a machete to kill three students and injure 13 others. In these instances just as much damage or greater can be inflicted without a firearm.

So that brings us to the consequences of banning guns.  The first danger is to that of the law abiding citizens who are unable to effectively defend themselves from physical harm. Sarah McKinley is an 18 year old single mother who was home alone with her three month old baby when an armed attacker crashed through her front door. Luckily for Sarah she had a shotgun and stopped the intruder "dead" in his tracks. What if Sarah didn't have a gun? Sure there non-lethal alternatives, but these alternatives are not likely two stop or dissuaded two or more aggressive attackers. The second danger is to that to our freedoms. If our second amendment rights can be so easily struck down then what about our first amendment rights? What if someone says or writes something that is unpopular? Is it then okay to strike down freedom of speech or freedom of the press? It becomes a slippery slope when our rights can be changed at whim to whichever way the political winds might be blowing. I've heard it asked why do we need this weapon or why do we need so many bullets? In the end it's not about what we need, we have a Bill of Rights not a Bill of Needs.

If we are unable to defend ourselves we become totally dependent upon the police, who usually arrive after the facts, to protect us. Freedoms are sacrificed in the name of security and we run the risk of becoming a police state. Do we really want to end up like the UK that needs 4.2 million CCTV's to watch everyone? There is a price that comes with safety and that price is freedom. As Benjamin Franklin so elegantly put it “Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”

There was a time in America when kids actually brought there guns to school so they could go hunting afterwards and some high schools even had a gun range for the ROTC in the 50's. The infamous Tommy Gun could be bought in hardware stores or through the mail. Guns have been a part of this nation since it's very inception. If guns are the problem then we would except a country like Switzerland, that issues automatic weapons to it's citizens, to be more violent but this is not the case. What we see to today with the senseless mass shootings is a fairly recent phenomenon in American history (with a few exceptions). So what happened? What happened is social decay that has been ongoing for several decades and is finally coming home to roost. Our lack of morals and virtues are what's really the problem of the mindless violence we see today. If all guns are banned only the symptom is treated, unless we start addressing the moral issues we will only see more violence and more government to control it.

Views: 106

Comment by Jerseygal on February 11, 2013 at 10:53pm

Well said, Watchman!  It is a shame that such a tragedy is politicized as this one is.  I know the left would be trying to take the guns from all the people who didn't shoot anything!

I agree about the decay of our nations' morals overall.  I think it really went downhill when prayer was removed from our schools sometime in the 1960s. 

I graduated high school in the 1970s, and our school had a rifle team!  We did competitive shooting with other schools in the area, and yes, we took our deer rifles and small game guns to school with us. 

Great post, I'm glad you took to the keyboard!  I'm tweeting it out!

Comment by Watchman on February 12, 2013 at 1:11am

Thank you for the compliment Jerseygal :)

Comment by Robin on February 12, 2013 at 9:30am

Great post watchman! Tweeting it out.

Comment by D.A. on February 12, 2013 at 10:05am

Very well said Watchman.  Thanks.

Comment by Steven Stelmach on February 13, 2013 at 9:24pm

"The arming of the whole proletariat with rifles, guns, and ammunition should be carried out at once [and] the workers must ... organize themselves into an independent guard, with their own chiefs and general staff. ... [The aim is] that the bourgeois democratic Government not only immediately loses all backing among the workers, but from the commencement finds itself under the supervision and threats of authorities behind whom stands the entire mass of the working class. ...As soon as the new Government is established they will commence to fight the workers.  In order that this party (i.e., the democrats) whose betrayal of the workers will begin with the first hour of victory, should be frustrated in its nefarious work, it is necessary to organize and arm the proletariat."

From Karl Marx, Address to the Communist League (1850).  Cited in E. Burns (ed.), A Handbook of Marxism (1935), p. 67.

Comment by Steven Despain on February 14, 2013 at 11:27am

 "social decay"  I agree, as you drive through American cities it is easy to see this Gang / prison, culture / mentality taking over. When I was a boy we were taught to serve others and be prepared. Now rather than morals and virtues kids see strength in violence and taking what they want.

I also feel that we need to stop using MURDER as entertainment. You can't turn on the TV without witnessing a violent murder. I was raised by the TV, now I can't let my kids watch it at all unless I'm right there with my finger on the remote.

Thanks Watchman!

Comment by Jodi180 on February 14, 2013 at 3:24pm

Great post!

Comment by Matt Kiolbassa on February 14, 2013 at 11:30pm

Well done and well said sir!

Comment by Gary De Capua on February 15, 2013 at 2:29am

Great article, however using the same Governments wording and the propaganda news media on Gun Control, Gun Bans, Gun Laws, Gun Restriction, Tighter Gun Laws and so on. Start using the proper wording: Gun Infringement Control, Gun Infringement Bans, Gun Infringement Restriction and Tighter Infringement Laws. INFRINGMENT, INFRINGMENT, INFRINGMENT . That's what it is INFRINGMENT.

Comment by Jodi180 on February 15, 2013 at 1:34pm

Nice take, Gary.

Comment

You need to be a member of Fundamental Refounding to add comments!

Join Fundamental Refounding

Attention:

 

 

Please view our mission, policy, and legal disclaimer to learn about us by visiting the main menu.  Thank you.

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION!

BRING BACK #HUAC

http://bit.ly/2mqIVmH 

CONTACT CONGRESS!

Let your voice be counted!

House:  http://1.usa.gov/mHZjgo

Senate:  http://1.usa.gov/3UAs

 

 

PLEASE PRAY FOR OUR NATION.

 

 

national debt

Founders' Corner

Latest Activity

Watchman replied to Robin's discussion White House Puts Out Statement Going After Fauci’s Credibility
"I never liked Fauci from the beginning. There was something about him that rubbed me the wrong way."
15 hours ago
Robin posted a discussion

White House Puts Out Statement Going After Fauci’s Credibility

The only reason Fauci was on this from the beginning is, he is head of the NIH! They had to have…See More
20 hours ago
Jerseygal liked Jodi180's discussion No One's Coming to Save America...We Must Save Ourselves
21 hours ago
Jerseygal replied to Watchman's discussion How the man who eradicated smallpox would have handled coronavirus
"I don’t know what the answer is, but common sense tells me we didn’t do it right with…"
21 hours ago
Jerseygal liked Watchman's discussion How the man who eradicated smallpox would have handled coronavirus
21 hours ago
Jodi180 replied to Robin's discussion Urgent Note From Gen. Flynn: ‘Silent Majority Can No Longer Be Silent’
"Gen Flynn was targeted because he knows where all the Obama & Co. skeletons are.  We…"
Wednesday
Robin posted a discussion

Trump Administration Moves To Withdraw U.S. From World Health Organization

The Trump administration has reportedly taken action toward withdrawing the U.S. from the World…See More
Tuesday
kwicgov55 replied to Robin's discussion Urgent Note From Gen. Flynn: ‘Silent Majority Can No Longer Be Silent’
"General Flynn is right. We have to find a way to stand up and fight back. People are scared to…"
Jul 5
kwicgov55 liked Robin's discussion Urgent Note From Gen. Flynn: ‘Silent Majority Can No Longer Be Silent’
Jul 5
Watchman posted a discussion

How the man who eradicated smallpox would have handled coronavirus

Whether we realize it or not, we have all been part of a grand experiment.  Never before have we…See More
Jul 4
Jodi180 replied to Jodi180's discussion No One's Coming to Save America...We Must Save Ourselves
"The Left's last dash is what's so frightening...'by all means necessary'. What…"
Jul 4
Robin replied to Robin's discussion Appeals court orders Flynn case dismissal, after years-long legal saga
"Sidney Powell: Flynn Knew About CIA Running Billions of Dollars ‘Off the Books’ Sidney…"
Jul 3
Watchman liked Robin's discussion Urgent Note From Gen. Flynn: ‘Silent Majority Can No Longer Be Silent’
Jul 3
Robin liked Jodi180's discussion No One's Coming to Save America...We Must Save Ourselves
Jul 3
Robin posted a discussion

Urgent Note From Gen. Flynn: ‘Silent Majority Can No Longer Be Silent’

Michael Flynn, a 3-star General who has paid a hefty price from this onslaught to take America…See More
Jul 3
kwicgov55 liked Lynn Rackoski's discussion U.N. Chief Guterres Calls for One Supreme Body of ‘Global Governance’
Jul 3

© 2020   Fundamental Refounding.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service