Views: 70

Comment by Doug Fox on March 17, 2012 at 8:32pm
Comment by Jerseygal on March 17, 2012 at 8:44pm

Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

EXECUTIVE ORDER

Section 201, in part:

(1)  the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;

This is potentially extremely dangerous!

Comment by JeansBrother on March 17, 2012 at 9:06pm

I just scanned through this document.  A couple of things stood out.

1) extensive use of the word shall -- shall is a term used in law to mean compelled with the possibility of punishment.  EOs are not law except within the Executive branch, over which the President has broad authority.

2) continuity of government has been moved from the DOD to Homeland security.

3) implied but explicitly omitted from the document is the declaration that Congress is no longer relevant.  Why? Because secretaries of the various departments now have the authority to loan and subsidize for critical national defense needs.

4) also, if you want to use anything that provides transportation you will have to check with the bureaucracy first.

Comment by Jerseygal on March 18, 2012 at 3:21am

Thanks for that briefing on this, JB!  The word 'shall' means 'damn well better' and thank you for pointing that out.  I have found it is a word that people often think is synonymous with 'may.'

Comment by Doug Fox on March 18, 2012 at 4:40pm

OK, every one....time to calm down a bit, Go to the government web site and look for Executive Order 12919 signed by Slick Willy on June 3, 1994.

I pulled it down onto Acrobat Reader but do not know how to attach it here,,,, BUT, it reads very similar to the one that O signed on Friday.

It allows the government to operate outside of the regulations in times of crises and has to be reviewed & updated periodically.  It addresses issues such as procurement - in an emergency do you want the government to do cost benefit analyses to buy equipment to respond to an emergency or would you rather they just hurry and buy what is needed to address the emergency,,, no brainer.

This is what happens when the government gets too big,, We the People do not trust that they are proceeding in our best interests no matter what they do.

Comment by JeansBrother on March 18, 2012 at 4:53pm

Doug, I can't, at this point, dispute what you say.  However, assuming that this is simply an update of EO 12919, it means that EO 12919 is also highly suspect and (in my simple way of thinking) probably unconstitutional in a number of ways.  For instance, I can find nowhere in the Constitution that provides for the Executive to ignore the Legislature or Judiciary in a time of emergency or crisis.  I also cannot find anywhere in the Constitution authority conferred on the Executive to ignore the independent republics (states) that joined together to form the federal government. 

The fact that the people (you and me) were asleep when Clinton was president explains why there was no concern about this back then.

Comment by Doug Fox on March 18, 2012 at 5:40pm

Hey JB, my point is,,, nothing has really changed,, this policy has been around for at least 18 years (that is where I stopped looking). It allows the government to do things out of the normal during a crisis. It was also policy when GW was in office, and it will probably be a policy when O gets his pink slip and the 'newbie' starts reviewing all EO's.

Comment by Doug Fox on March 18, 2012 at 5:58pm
Comment by JeansBrother on March 18, 2012 at 6:09pm

Doug, I understand your point and that this is not particularly new in the scheme of things.  It may even go all the way back to Reagan when the Continuity of Government program started as a way of preserving national leadership in the event of nuclear war. But, even as good a reason as that is, it does not follow the principles embodied in the Constitution.

Assuming this EO is an update of EO12919, they both seem to be unconstitutional.  I don't recall anywhere in the Constitution that it provides for the Executive to assume all powers of the government even temporarily.  I also have not found the permission for one branch of government to ignore the other two, even temporarily.  Emergency conditions or not, the Constitution requires three branches of government.

Further EO12919 should have been challenged when it was written because it was (probably) unconstitutional then.  But, we were asleep at the time.

Comment by Doug Fox on March 18, 2012 at 6:30pm

JB, here is my point, with all respect - all over the blogosphere today I am seeing people ready to start grabbing guns and hitting the streets. Well the argument will be,,, why is everyone so upset about an Executive policy that has been around for 20 years- there is no rational argument, we do not need to come off as irrational. Rational truthful arguments win the day - people in the streets screaming conspiracy theory are just that,,,people in the streets screaming.

Comment

You need to be a member of Fundamental Refounding to add comments!

Join Fundamental Refounding

Attention:

 

 

Please view our mission, policy, and legal disclaimer to learn about us by visiting the main menu.  Thank you.

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION!

BRING BACK #HUAC

http://bit.ly/2mqIVmH 

CONTACT CONGRESS!

Let your voice be counted!

House:  http://1.usa.gov/mHZjgo

Senate:  http://1.usa.gov/3UAs

 

 

PLEASE PRAY FOR OUR NATION.

 

 

national debt

Founders' Corner

Latest Activity

kwicgov55 liked Watchman's discussion 10 Reasons Why I Believe Trump Will Be Reelected
yesterday
kwicgov55 replied to Ruthann's discussion Paul Harvey 1965 Broadcast is relevant today!
"I loved Paul Harvey and listened to him often. Although I remember hearing this on the radio when…"
yesterday
kwicgov55 liked Ruthann's discussion Paul Harvey 1965 Broadcast is relevant today!
yesterday
kwicgov55 liked Watchman's discussion Trump vs fake news circa 1990
yesterday
kwicgov55 replied to Doug Fox's discussion Traitors Justice II
"The video has been taken down and the user for the account has been terminated! I do not know what…"
yesterday
Duke posted a discussion

Gov. Hairdo and California

So Newsom wants to limit family gatherings for Thanksgiving and Christmas and any other holiday to…See More
Sunday
Watchman replied to Jerseygal's discussion History Is on the Side of Republicans Filling a Supreme Court Vacancy in 2020
"I fully expect ACB will be confirmed. The Dems have all but given up on fighting that battle.…"
Friday
Robin replied to Jerseygal's discussion History Is on the Side of Republicans Filling a Supreme Court Vacancy in 2020
"GOP-led Senate panel advances Barrett despite Dems' boycott WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate…"
Thursday
Robin replied to Duke's discussion California
"Wow Duke, that is horrible. I thought NJ was bad, but, you have it far worse than we do here. I…"
Thursday
Duke replied to Duke's discussion California
"It's great to see folks line the streets just to watch his motorcade pass by like in Laguna…"
Oct 21
Robin replied to Watchman's discussion 10 Reasons Why I Believe Trump Will Be Reelected
"I agree with all 10~! I feel in my gut, he will be reelected by a landslide, even with the…"
Oct 20
Robin liked Watchman's discussion 10 Reasons Why I Believe Trump Will Be Reelected
Oct 20
Robin replied to Doug Fox's discussion Traitors Justice II
"Chuck Callesto @ChuckCallesto BREAKING REPORT: FBI and DOJ both agree, HUNTER BIDEN EMAILS ARE NOT…"
Oct 20
Robin replied to Doug Fox's discussion Traitors Justice II
"Matthew Tyrmand @MatthewTyrmand BREAKING: hearing that Bevan Cooney has just been removed from the…"
Oct 20
Robin replied to Doug Fox's discussion Traitors Justice II
"Exclusive: Biden Defector’s Emails Reveal Hunter’s Associates Viewed Direct…"
Oct 20
Robin replied to Doug Fox's discussion Traitors Justice II
"BOOM! Rudy Giuliani Announces New Documents to Be Released Wednesday Will Show Financial Crimes and…"
Oct 20

© 2020   Fundamental Refounding.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service