The Attorney General's office is a part of the Executive.  The AG is honored with cabinet level status, and especially serves the President.

The AG cannot work against the Executive which is served, unless the President be so foolish as to allow.

Law establishing appointment of a special prosecutor has been changed.  Whereas the original law called for a three judge panel to appoint the special prosecutor, that is no longer the requirement---but the new arrangement has not been tested by the Supreme Court.

Under original conditions, the AG was required to transition from the Executive to the Judiciary, regarding appointment of special prosecutor/Presidential investigation.  Therefore Mueller's appointment is violating requirement for separation of powers, and accordingly, it is unconstitutional.

The President has lawful authority to fire or reassign the AG at his discretion, and may do so during Senate recess, so that replacement of the current AG need not receive Senate confirmation.

Views: 24

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Interesting.  Thanks, Kurtis.

You're quite welcome. 

Might add, the AG could appoint special prosecutor for reason other than to investigate the Executive (or any part thereof).  Of course such task would normally be assigned to an AG staff member, but there could be some reason to step outside his Office.

The reasoning roughly compares to the following.  if you hire an attorney to represent during criminal trial, said attorney cannot enter the Court and inform the Judge you have confessed guilt, and etc.---your legal counsel cannot work against you.

When thoroughly considered, the AG is in position to gain "inside information" especially owing to confidential cabinet meetings.  Broadly speaking, his authority does not allow him, or his office, to use such information against the President who is served.

At best, the AG could develop a report and request review by a panel of judges, but he cannot omit said transition to the Judiciary---separation of powers, and other reason forbid it.

Time will pass, and we'll all see how it "shakes out".

It does not appear Mueller complies with law concerning conflict of interest, or that he ever can.  The President publicly discloses his awareness of Presidential pardon.  So, all things considered, Mueller should never have been appointed, and should now resign or be fired, because it does not appear he has a snowball's chance in hell of ruining the President.

Good to know, Kurtis. I don't think Trump will fire Sessions though. It would really cause a firestorm. 

Sessions can be persuaded to reassignment---it will accomplish the same result.

In my view, there's a hell of a firestorm already going---it's up to the President to put it out. 

I do not expect Lindsey Graham will like getting doused, but he should not have crossed swords with the President.

I do believe Sessions may be reassigned, like you stated. Sounds like a possibility on the news this morning. 

Given the mess resulting from his recusal, it's likely the President will replace him.

Here's more of my perspective on Mr. Sessions:

SAUCE FOR THE GANDER IS SAUCE FOR THE GOOSE.  The Federal law applies to Robert Mueller, same as Attorney General Sessions.

Attorney General Sessions honorably embraces law---28 CFR 45.2.  He uses such reasoning to recuse himself, which is fine, well, and good.
However, AG Sessions has responsibility to demand Special Counsel Mueller embrace the very same law.
Given authority of AG Sessions, it's reasonable that he end Mueller's "investigation" for the very same reason he recused himself---Mueller does not, and cannot ever, comply with Federal law concerning conflict of interest.  Mueller's unique obligations are better defined by a second portion of the law---28 CFR 600.7.
Links to both legal considerations are:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/45.2
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/600.7

RSS

Attention:

 

 

Please view our mission, policy, and legal disclaimer to learn about us by visiting the main menu.  Thank you.

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION!

BRING BACK #HUAC

http://bit.ly/2mqIVmH 

CONTACT CONGRESS!

Let your voice be counted!

House:  http://1.usa.gov/mHZjgo

Senate:  http://1.usa.gov/3UAs

 

 

PLEASE PRAY FOR OUR NATION.

 

 

national debt

Founders' Corner

Latest Activity

Fundamental Refounding replied to Barbara Leypoldt's discussion Hillary Under Oath: Judge Rules Clinton Must answer These Two Questions Under Oath
"Tom Fitton GREAT NEWS: Fed court rules Hillary Clinton must answer written questions, under oath,…"
1 hour ago
Fundamental Refounding replied to Robin's discussion Election Fraud Expert: Brenda Snipes Allowed Illegal Aliens and Felons to Vote; Illegally Destroyed Ballots
"Republican DeSantis secures Florida governor's seat after rival Gillum concedes TAMPA, Fla.,…"
1 hour ago
Fundamental Refounding posted a discussion

Comey And Lynch Will Be Subpoenaed By Senate Unless Feinstein Obstructs

Things are going to get pretty interesting.Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) says…See More
1 hour ago
Robin replied to Barbara Leypoldt's discussion Hillary Under Oath: Judge Rules Clinton Must answer These Two Questions Under Oath
"I bet she takes the 5th!"
1 hour ago
Robin replied to Robin's discussion Election Fraud Expert: Brenda Snipes Allowed Illegal Aliens and Felons to Vote; Illegally Destroyed Ballots
"Florida Dems ‘Lawyer Up’ As State, Feds Begin Criminal Investigations Against Them For…"
1 hour ago
Robin replied to Robin's discussion Election Fraud Expert: Brenda Snipes Allowed Illegal Aliens and Felons to Vote; Illegally Destroyed Ballots
"Hahaha! I would too. :)"
1 hour ago
Watchman replied to Robin's discussion GUNS IN AMERICA Dem congressman: Force gun owners to get rid of assault weapons Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., drops a grenade into the middle of the gun debate.
"“the right to live is supreme over any other.” And the right to defend yourself…"
5 hours ago
Griswold liked Robin's discussion GUNS IN AMERICA Dem congressman: Force gun owners to get rid of assault weapons Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., drops a grenade into the middle of the gun debate.
7 hours ago
Griswold replied to Robin's discussion GUNS IN AMERICA Dem congressman: Force gun owners to get rid of assault weapons Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., drops a grenade into the middle of the gun debate.
"And if he buy back plan fails the gov't has nukes. "
7 hours ago
Robin posted a discussion
12 hours ago
Robin liked Watchman's discussion First-Wave of Migrants Who’ve Been Scaling Fence and Taunting US Officials Get Rude Awakening Next Day
13 hours ago
Robin liked Luis522's blog post When Will America Stop Being America?
14 hours ago
Luis522 commented on Luis522's blog post When Will America Stop Being America?
"Hello, Watchman. You've mistaken my heavy-sarcasm for over-enthusiasm (YAAAY!!!). …"
yesterday
Watchman posted a discussion

First-Wave of Migrants Who’ve Been Scaling Fence and Taunting US Officials Get Rude Awakening Next Day

The mainstream media has been telling us for weeks that the migrant caravan is no big deal, it’s…See More
yesterday
Watchman commented on Luis522's blog post When Will America Stop Being America?
""Btw, France and Germany are talking about establishing their own unified army. To that I say…"
yesterday
Griswold liked Barbara Leypoldt's discussion Hillary Under Oath: Judge Rules Clinton Must answer These Two Questions Under Oath
yesterday

TRAFFIC



© 2018   Fundamental Refounding.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service