Hillary Under Oath: Judge Rules Clinton Must answer These Two Questions Under Oath

Judicial Watch announced today that a federal judge has ruled that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has 30 days to answer questions under oath about her email server.

The questions date back to 2016, when Clinton was required to submit answers to Judicial Watch’s multiple inquiries under oath. She refused, and instead responded that she did “not recall” 20 separate times in her answers concerning her personal email system.

After what Judicial Watch describes as a “lengthy hearing” yesterday, Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled that Clinton must answer the following two questions under oath:

Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.
During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said of the ruling, “It is shameful that Judicial Watch attorneys must continue to battle the State and Justice Departments, which still defend Hillary Clinton, for basic answers to our questions about Clinton’s email misconduct.”

The court refused to unseal deposition videos of Clinton State Department officials such as Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills. it also upheld Clinton’s objections about why she refused to stop using her personal Blackberry device as a form of communication, despite security warnings from State Department personnel.

The hearing and court ruling are part of the latest developments in Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit about the employment status of Clinton’s former deputy chief of staff, Huma Abedin, who was engaged in outside employment while serving at the State Department. The case was reopened, Judicial Watch explains, because of the discovery of Clinton’s use of a private email server.
https://bongino.com/federal-judge-rules-hillary-clinton-must-answer...

Views: 12

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I bet she takes the 5th!  Don't know if she can because it's a FOIA

Tom Fitton

GREAT NEWS: Fed court rules Hillary Clinton must answer written questions, under oath, about how and why she set up her email system! @JudicialWatch's Herculean efforts for accountability pay off. Will discuss this hour on @FoxFriendsFirst on @FoxNews. https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-wa...

RSS

Attention:

 

 

Please view our mission, policy, and legal disclaimer to learn about us by visiting the main menu.  Thank you.

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION!

BRING BACK #HUAC

http://bit.ly/2mqIVmH 

CONTACT CONGRESS!

Let your voice be counted!

House:  http://1.usa.gov/mHZjgo

Senate:  http://1.usa.gov/3UAs

 

 

PLEASE PRAY FOR OUR NATION.

 

 

national debt

Founders' Corner

Latest Activity

Robin replied to Luis522's discussion France's Global Warming Gas Tax
"BELGIUM: UN MIGRATION PACT TO BRING IN 59 MILLION MUSLIMS. Protest against the UN migration pact…"
5 hours ago
Robin replied to Luis522's discussion France's Global Warming Gas Tax
"'Yellow Vest’ protests spread to London as demonstrators take over bridges and shut down…"
5 hours ago
Robin replied to Robin's discussion HUGE! U.S. Federal Judge Rules Obamacare Unconstitutional
"I'm hopeful SCOTUS will rule it unconstitutional"
5 hours ago
Jerome replied to Fundamental Refounding's discussion Congress Reaches a Deal Ending Taxpayer-Funded Sexual Harassment Settlements
"Ironic how quickly this deal was struck.  Literally hundreds of Congressmen and Senators have…"
14 hours ago
Jerome replied to Robin's discussion HUGE! U.S. Federal Judge Rules Obamacare Unconstitutional
"Agreed!"
14 hours ago
Robin replied to Fundamental Refounding's discussion Congress Reaches a Deal Ending Taxpayer-Funded Sexual Harassment Settlements
"Great point by Diamond and Silk! @DiamondandSilk If a government official pays off an accuser of an…"
yesterday
Robin replied to Doug Fox's discussion Intelligence Community White Hats
yesterday
Fundamental Refounding liked Jodi180's discussion Rep. Jim Jordon Exposes Google CEO
yesterday
Fundamental Refounding posted a discussion

Congress Reaches a Deal Ending Taxpayer-Funded Sexual Harassment Settlements

Now that this has ended at taxpayer expense, we deserve the names of everyone in congress that used…See More
yesterday
kwicgov55 replied to Jodi180's discussion Something In Broward County Smells Like Obama
"You are very welcome Robin. God bless & Merry Christmas to you and yours as well. :-)"
yesterday
kwicgov55 replied to Robin's discussion HUGE! U.S. Federal Judge Rules Obamacare Unconstitutional
"Of course it will be repealed by the Scotus. The republicans had plenty of time to repeal…"
yesterday
Robin replied to Robin's discussion HUGE! U.S. Federal Judge Rules Obamacare Unconstitutional
"The White House has stated the ACA will remain in place until this is decided by the Supreme…"
yesterday
Robin replied to Robin's discussion HUGE! U.S. Federal Judge Rules Obamacare Unconstitutional
"The returns of the 46 largest middlemen in healthcare account for roughly 41% of the profits…"
yesterday
Edie Boudreau shared Fundamental Refounding's discussion on Facebook
yesterday
Edie Boudreau shared Fundamental Refounding's discussion on Facebook
yesterday
Edie Boudreau shared Fundamental Refounding's discussion on Facebook
yesterday

TRAFFIC



© 2018   Fundamental Refounding.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service