This situation clearly has two sides - does the church have a First Amendment right to use the structure for worship, or does the village have the right to say what entity can operate in its various ‘zones?’   Surely the church would seek non-profit status for at least a portion of the real estate tax, which means that the village would lose all or part of that tax revenue.  I’d love to see some discussions!  Patriots, please weigh in!

CFC back before Canton village Zoning Board of Appeals over using 25 Court Street for offices
Thursday, February 21, 2019 - 5:18 pm

By ADAM ATKINSON
North Country This Week

CANTON – The village Zoning Board of Appeals will convene Monday, March 4 at 7 p.m. in the village courtroom, 61 Main St., to discuss and possibly act on request by the Christian Fellowship Center to use the property at 25 Court St. for professional office space.

The church was denied an office space use permit by code enforcer Jeffrey Murray in January. Murray’s denial is based on village zoning code which does not allow churches or religious organizations in the municipality’s C1 commercial zone where the property is located.

The CFC has recently launched a lawsuit against the village over the denial of a use permit to hold religious services at the 25 Court St. building formerly known as The Club restaurant. A denial of that use permit was handed down by Murray for the same zoning reason in January and subsequently upheld by the ZBA when the church asked them for a reinterpretation of village code.

The village is represented by Clifton Park attorney Gregg Johnson of Johnson & Laws LLC. Chicago legal firm Mauck & Baker LLC is representing the CFC in the matter.

Read more about the firms here.

The CFC bought the property for $310,000 at the beginning of January without securing any kind of use permit for the site and before receiving the ZBA’s decision. The ZBA’s support of Murray’s first denial was based on the village zoning code and the determination under federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act that the church was not being treated as less than equal to another organization or individual seeking use permits in the village.

The ZBA’s deliberations pointed out that other organizations and persons would also have to follow established village zoning laws to obtain use permits.

The C1 zone is a relatively compact area in the village’s downtown business district and was set up seemingly to concentrate commercial businesses in one area. Several other zones in the village do allow churches and religious organizations

http://northcountrynow.com/news/cfc-back-canton-village-zoning-boar...

Views: 53

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Not really enough info to form an opinion on. Could be limitations thru zoning due to parking issues or any number of other reasons. If the zoning board reasoning is because it's a religious institution operating in town, well that's different problem. 

Doug, I am not sure if Zoning Hearing Board transcripts are available.  I’ve argued both sides of this in my head for days - winters are long here LOL!

  • Church purchased the property without securing that use permit, or maybe without learning that they needed one in the first place. Caveat emptor, right?
  • The village has several churches in the immediate area, but on other streets ...literally around the corner or, in the opposite direction, up the street.
  • The building in question has some parking, but I don’t remember how much-  I attended numerous political ‘meet and greet’ events there when it was a restaurant.
  • I believe a municipality has the right to plan for its own future, in terms of growth and development, keeping in mind that such plans must not be discriminatory (like how do you allow an art gallery but not a tattoo parlor?)
  • I also believe that a municipality should respect individual property rights, and not act as regimented HOA

Any additional pros or cons with the info at hand?

Not quite sure on this. I know here it all comes down to zoning. When we got this property, it was zoned commercial. In order for us to build our house, we had to go before the zoning board and sign paperwork that we would not operate a business out of here. They then switched it to residential, but, the zoning board needed papers signed from us as well. This property was used for a business since 1976.

Robin, I see the benefits of zoning laws.  I was actually involved with planning and zoning.  I google-mapped this for you, Native.  I know the town as well.....this will help you all understand why it can be confusing, and lead some to believe that a First Amendment violation exists.  I marked the property in question with a red blob.

What isn’t shown are the numerous shops, restaurants, pizzerias, insurance offices, banks, locksmith, liquor store......all in within a 3 minute walk.

I'm getting what you're saying about it now. I believe it could be a violation of the 1st amendment. especially with other churches in close proximity and all the other things around it.

This sounds like a zoning issue, not a 1st. amendment right issue. 

......unless zoning laws violate the First Amendment....

Hmm, that is something to think about.

RSS

Attention:

 

 

Please view our mission, policy, and legal disclaimer to learn about us by visiting the main menu.  Thank you.

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION!

BRING BACK #HUAC

http://bit.ly/2mqIVmH 

CONTACT CONGRESS!

Let your voice be counted!

House:  http://1.usa.gov/mHZjgo

Senate:  http://1.usa.gov/3UAs

 

 

PLEASE PRAY FOR OUR NATION.

 

 

national debt

Founders' Corner

Latest Activity

kwicgov55 replied to Watchman's discussion Where is everyone?
"Thanks for the information Duke. Your post is the first notification that I have received from FR…"
18 hours ago
Duke posted a status
"Look at "Nuremberg 2.0 friends, on you tube."
yesterday
Duke replied to Watchman's discussion Where is everyone?
"The big "SCAM", it's all been a lie.  Please check out "Nuremberg…"
yesterday
kwicgov55 replied to Watchman's discussion Where is everyone?
"I believe you are right Watchman. I also think that the presidential election isn't the only…"
Jun 7
kwicgov55 replied to Watchman's discussion Where is everyone?
"I've wondered the same thing Watchman. I haven't had any notifications from FR in months.…"
Jun 7
Jodi180 replied to Watchman's discussion Where is everyone?
"Wow...that sounds like a horrible winter!  Good to hear your getting mobile and feeling…"
Jun 2
Ruthann replied to Watchman's discussion Where is everyone?
"Hi Jodi, I was sick most of the winter passing out & dizzy. Nothing worst then regaining…"
Jun 1
Jodi180 replied to Watchman's discussion Where is everyone?
"Hi Ruthann...good to see you back here.  Yep, think it's high time to regroup!"
Jun 1
Ruthann posted discussions
May 27
Ruthann replied to Watchman's discussion Where is everyone?
"I check in from time to time but there never seems to be anyone here.  HELLO! IS ANYONE STILL…"
May 26
Jodi180 replied to Watchman's discussion Where is everyone?
"I agree.  We need a movement like 2009. According to the talking heads, cRATS can expect a…"
May 8
Watchman replied to Watchman's discussion Where is everyone?
"I think we have a good idea how it happened, and it was executed brilliantly. They used Covid as…"
May 7
kwicgov55 liked Jodi180's discussion "Why Vaccine Passports Equal Slavery Forever"
May 5
Jodi180 posted a discussion

"Why Vaccine Passports Equal Slavery Forever"

Um...anyone else unnerved by this vid?According to Dr. Wolf...this will probably get me on a list.See More
May 3
Jodi180 replied to Watchman's discussion Where is everyone?
"Still trying to understand how this happened? I think we're shell-shocked, Watchman."
May 3
Watchman posted a discussion

Where is everyone?

It's been really quiet since the phony inauguration on Jan 20th. Where is everyone?See More
May 2

© 2021   Fundamental Refounding.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service