More US Troops in Syria, Iraq Possible Under Mattis Plan

A cavalry scout assigned to the 1st Squadron, 73rd Cavalry Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, scans his sector during his guard shift near Makhmour, Iraq on Jan. 27, 2017. (US Army/Spc. Ian Ryan)

U.S. troop increases in Syria and Iraq could be part of the plan for speeding up the campaign against ISIS that Defense Secretary Jim Mattis will present to the White House next week, military officials said Wednesday.

Army Gen. Joseph Votel, commander of U.S. Central Command, told reporters traveling with him in the Mideast, "It could be that we take on a larger burden ourselves" in supporting a combined Syrian Arab and Syrian Kurdish force closing on the ISIS stronghold of Raqqa, Syria. "That's an option."

It was less clear whether Mattis would consider a U.S. troop increase in Iraq.

Last week, during a visit by the new defense secretary to Iraq to assess the situation, Army Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend, commander of Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve, said, "I have all the authorities I need to prosecute our fight, and I am confident that if I were to need more that my leadership would provide those."

However, Air Force Col. John Dorrian, a task force spokesman, said in a video briefing Wednesday to the Pentagon, "I don't want to speculate on what we're going to ask for" in presentations to Mattis. "We've provided our input to General Votel" and that input is working its way through the chain of command."

He added, "We're awaiting decisions."

In his Senate confirmation hearing, Mattis spoke to the possibility of "accelerating" the campaign against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. On Jan. 27, President Donald Trump directed him to draw up a plan within 30 days.

Trump has spoken favorably on the creation of safe zones for refugees in Syria, which would potentially require major increases in the U.S. troop presence to police and protect them. The president renewed his support for safe zones at what was billed as a campaign rally in Florida last week, and said that the Gulf states would pay for them.

"We're going to have the Gulf states pay for those safe zones," Trump said. "They have nothing but money."

Mattis is prepared to submit the ISIS plan to Trump next week, Navy Capt. Jeff Davis, a Pentagon spokesman, said Tuesday. "It will address ISIS globally, and it is not just a DoD plan," he said. "We're charged with leading the development of the plan, but it absolutely calls upon the capabilities of other departments.

"We have been working diligently with our interagency partners to develop it with the intelligence community, our military commanders on the ground, the Joint Staff and our policy team here, and it represents the input of a number of other departments," Davis said.

On the ground in the Mideast, Votel told reporters, "I am very concerned about maintaining momentum" in the simultaneous campaigns to take Raqqa and liberate the western sector of Mosul in northwestern Iraq.

Currently, the U.S. has about 500 troops, mostly Special Forces, in Syria and more than 5,000 in Iraq in train, assist and advisory roles. In the coming fight for Raqqa, Votel said, "We want to bring the right capabilities forward."

"Not all of those are necessarily resident in the special operations community. If we need additional artillery or things like that, I want to be able to bring those forward to augment our operations," Votel said, according to The New York Times.

"We might bring potentially more of our assets to bear if we need to, as opposed to relying on our partners" under the umbrella group called the Syrian Democratic Forces, he said. "That's an option."

In his statements last week, Townsend said U.S. troops in advisory roles are moving closer to the front lines with the Iraqi Security Forces as the battle for Mosul intensifies. "It is true that we are operating closer and deeper into the Iraqi formation," he said. "We adjusted our posture during the east Mosul fight and embedded advisers a bit further down into the formation."

The result has been that U.S. troops serving as Joint Terminal Attack Controllers to guide airstrikes and in other advisory capacities have increasingly come under fire, Dorrian said in his briefing from Baghdad to the Pentagon.

"When someone is shooting at you, that is combat. Yes. That has happened," Dorrian said. "They have come under fire at different times, [and] they have returned fire at different times in and around Mosul."

There have been no recent reports of U.S. combat deaths in Iraq, and Dorrian declined to say whether any U.S. troops had been wounded in the fighting in and around Mosul.

He said the U.S. military in Iraq and Syria does not immediately report on the number of wounded troops, if any, to avoid giving intelligence to the enemy. Casualty figures would be compiled at a later date by the Defense Department, he said.

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2017/02/22/more-us-troops-syria-...

Views: 48

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Why can't we use the Special Forces on the ground already there and just bomb them? Here we go again sending troops in on the ground to re-fight a war in Iraq we had already won. I hate Obama for pulling troops out.

I found this significant.  We've spent billions, our men and women gave their lives, and America got nothing for it.  

"We're going to have the Gulf states pay for those safe zones," Trump said. "They have nothing but money."

Obama had a situation that required some continued maintenance to secure what our men and women had won.  He failed miserably, and now others will pay the price.  We can't win with only air strikes.  Obama proved that.  It saddens me that we most put more people in harms way on foreign soil, but I don't think there is another way. 

I agree JG. If we are really serious about getting rid of ISIS once and for all, it will take a massive ground campaign like we did with the surge in Baghdad. Airstrikes are good, but they can only do so much. Usually in a major offensive, the military will bomb the heck out of them first to soften them up, then send in the ground troops. It will also require coordination with Syria and Russia, otherwise they will have room to retreat when they start losing. And then it would require a permanent presence in Iraq. It would be a big commitment and sacrifice on our part, but on the plus side we would have permanent bases in Iraq to launch our counter-terrorism efforts and limit Iran's influence in the region. I don't know of anyone else who has the will and capabilities to do it, except us.

Well said, Watchman. I'm not a fan of having bases in other countries, but I do understand the necessity for our interests, an dtjose of our allies. I think we all knew that we'd be back there when obama pulled out. If we aren't going in to win, then we need to pull out altogether. Of all the people who ran last year, I do think only Trump will have th eresolve to get it done right. His advantage? He will take the advice of the generals and advisors, and he doesn't care what the press thinks about it.

No one but the USA can lead this. What bothers me is how depleted Obama left our military. 

Unfortunately for our service members we will now lose even more of them. They will lose limbs, come back with PTSD, or, not come back at all because of Obama pulling out, on purpose I might add, so his buddies can build their califate. It pisses me off to no end. 

Yes Robin, Obama is much to blame for the current situation in the middle-east. He left prematurely, which created a vacuum in Iraq. The government of Iraq is also to blame because they wanted us out, which was unwise on their part. Obama then toppled Gaddafi which allowed his arms to proliferate across the middle-east, and allowed ISIS a foothold in North Africa. He also supported the Arab Spring which toppled Mubarak in Egypt and allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to get in power (for awhile), and which ultimately led to the civil war in Syria and the rise of ISIS. As Mark Levin would say, he was a one-man wrecking ball.

Indeed, Obama was a one man wrecking ball. We will be paying the price for a very long time unfortunately. 

RSS

Attention:

 

 

Please view our mission, policy, and legal disclaimer to learn about us by visiting the main menu.  Thank you.

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION!

AGENDA 21/2030

http://bit.ly/2mqIVmH 

CONTACT CONGRESS!

Let your voice be counted!

House:  http://1.usa.gov/mHZjgo

Senate:  http://1.usa.gov/3UAs

 

 

PLEASE PRAY FOR OUR NATION.

 

 

national debt

Founders' Corner

Latest Activity

kwicgov55 liked Fundamental Refounding's discussion Trump plans to release JFK Assassination Documents
16 hours ago
kwicgov55 replied to Fundamental Refounding's discussion Fri Tids 10/20/17 TOP TID Senate Passes Budget Resolution Paving Way for Tax Reform
"Great info. Shared."
16 hours ago
kwicgov55 liked Fundamental Refounding's discussion Fri Tids 10/20/17 TOP TID Senate Passes Budget Resolution Paving Way for Tax Reform
16 hours ago
Robin replied to Robin's discussion HANNITY: New Evidence Proves Clinton-Russia Collusion
"Panama Papers Reveal Clinton’s Kremlin Connection John and Tony Podesta aren’t fooling…"
21 hours ago
Bruce O'Hara replied to Fundamental Refounding's discussion Trump plans to release JFK Assassination Documents
"I remember that, after the Warren Commission study, the govt stated that all of the files would be…"
yesterday
JeansBrother replied to Fundamental Refounding's discussion Trump plans to release JFK Assassination Documents
"For a government OF the people, BY the people and FOR the people, there are certainly a lot of…"
yesterday
Robin replied to Robin's discussion HANNITY: New Evidence Proves Clinton-Russia Collusion
"Grassley wants 'gag order' lifted for FBI informant allegedly 'threatened' by…"
yesterday
Robin liked Fundamental Refounding's discussion Trump plans to release JFK Assassination Documents
yesterday
Robin replied to Fundamental Refounding's discussion Trump plans to release JFK Assassination Documents
"JW Lawsuit Forced National Archives’ Release of Kennedy Docs A Judicial Watch lawsuit has…"
yesterday
Fundamental Refounding replied to JeansBrother's discussion NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS VOLUME 24, NUMBER 41
"Thank you for posting this. The gun grabbers never stop. Sharing this! "
yesterday
Fundamental Refounding liked JeansBrother's discussion NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS VOLUME 24, NUMBER 41
yesterday
Fundamental Refounding replied to Robin's discussion HANNITY: New Evidence Proves Clinton-Russia Collusion
"Both the House and Senate opened investigations into this Uranium One deal and Muller is in this up…"
yesterday
Fundamental Refounding posted discussions
yesterday
Rick replied to Robin's discussion HANNITY: New Evidence Proves Clinton-Russia Collusion
"Obama DOJ threatened FBI informant if he spoke to congress regarding his knowledge of the Uranium…"
yesterday
JeansBrother posted a discussion
yesterday
JeansBrother replied to Robin's discussion HANNITY: New Evidence Proves Clinton-Russia Collusion
"So, does anyone know what shuts off Mueller's investigation(s)?   When must he quit?"
yesterday

TRAFFIC



© 2017   Fundamental Refounding.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service