Ford to Build in America, Cancel Mexico Expansion Plans as ‘Vote of Confidence’ in Donald Trump

Ford will build a plant in Michigan instead of Mexico as a “vote of confidence” in President-elect Donald J. Trump’s incoming administration, its CEO Mark Fields announced on Tuesday.

The announcement means Ford will cancel its plans to build a new plant in Mexico and will instead invest $700 million in Michigan—creating 700 new jobs here in the United States—CNN reports.

“We didn’t cut a deal with Trump. We did it for our business,” Fields told CNN, noting that his company had conversations on Tuesday with Trump and Vice President-elect Mike Pence. Trump and Pence will officially be sworn in on Jan. 20.

Fields said his company’s decision to create jobs in America rather than in Mexico is a “vote of confidence” in Trump’s incoming administration and the pro-business environment it will create.

The investment, CNN reports, will be at the plant in Flat Rock, Michigan, and will aim “to produce more electric and self-driving cars” since “Ford believes electric vehicles will outsell gasoline-powered vehicles within the next 15 years.”

Trump’s success in keeping Ford jobs here is winning praise even from labor unions.

“I am thrilled that we have been able to secure additional UAW-Ford jobs for American workers,” Jimmy Settles, the UAW’s vice president, said.

CNN notes that Ford’s decision to keep the jobs here in the U.S. rather than shipping them overseas to Mexico—as it announced early in 2016—is a “major U-Turn” for the auto manufacturer.

“The news is a major U-turn for Ford,” CNN wrote. “Last year, the company announced it would invest $1.6 billion in Mexico to transfer the production of the Ford Focus from Michigan to Mexico to save costs. Now the Focus will be built at an existing plant in Hermosillo, Mexico, and Ford will expand its plant in Flat Rock.”

Breitbart News was the first news organization to ask Trump about Ford’s plans to ship jobs to Mexico. In an interview back in February 2016, Breitbart News asked Trump about this decision from Ford—and about similar plans from Carrier Corporation, which had planned to expand in Mexico and shut down U.S. facilities in Indianapolis—and Trump laid out his exact plans to keep the jobs here in the United States instead of seeing them drained to Mexico.

“There’s only one way you’re going to reverse it, and that’s that you’re going to have to make it more expensive to do business that way,” Trump told Breitbart News back then about the news from Ford and Carrier that they planned to go overseas:

First of all, you’re going to have to look to lower taxes [for those who do business inside the United States]—and we may very well have to charge taxes at the border, when somebody drives a car through the border to sell it in the United States. But look, we’ve closed our plants. We’ve lost our jobs. They’re no going to build cars in Mexico and sell them in the United States, okay? We can lower our taxes, and we’re probably going to have to charge a surtax at the border. Otherwise we’re going to lose a fortune. And that will help Ford and other people make a decision to buy in the United States, to build in the United States.

Even though he’s not even president yet, Trump has already succeeded on both cases, Carrier and Ford. He’s also succeeded in getting 8,000 other jobs in the U.S. with Sprint and OneWeb, news announced last week.

Trump, of course, shocked the political class by winning the state of Michigan against Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton on Nov. 8 on his pathway to 306 electoral votes.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/03/ford-to-build-in...

Views: 23

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This paragraph says it all:

Fields said his company’s decision to create jobs in America rather than in Mexico is a “vote of confidence” in Trump’s incoming administration and the pro-business environment it will create.

Does that mean that Ford had little confidence in the Obama economy?  Does that mean a pro-business environment doesn't exist now? Uh, yes, and yes.

Does that mean that Ford had little confidence in the Obama economy?  Does that mean a pro-business environment doesn't exist now? Uh, yes, and yes.

Yup, yup. Speaks volumes!  

The question then is will the cost of Ford's also increase as a result? The reason these companies are going overseas is because its cheaper, and as a result it ends up being cheaper for the consumer as well. The higher cost in the U.S. will have to be offset somewhere.

I don't think so, JB! Once the tax rate is lowered through the tax reform, there will be no reason to increase the price of a vehicle. 

RSS

Attention:

 

 

Please view our mission, policy, and legal disclaimer to learn about us by visiting the main menu.  Thank you.

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION!

AGENDA 21/2030

http://bit.ly/2mqIVmH 

CONTACT CONGRESS!

Let your voice be counted!

House:  http://1.usa.gov/mHZjgo

Senate:  http://1.usa.gov/3UAs

 

 

PLEASE PRAY FOR OUR NATION.

 

 

national debt

Founders' Corner

Latest Activity

kwicgov55 liked Fundamental Refounding's discussion Trump plans to release JFK Assassination Documents
16 hours ago
kwicgov55 replied to Fundamental Refounding's discussion Fri Tids 10/20/17 TOP TID Senate Passes Budget Resolution Paving Way for Tax Reform
"Great info. Shared."
16 hours ago
kwicgov55 liked Fundamental Refounding's discussion Fri Tids 10/20/17 TOP TID Senate Passes Budget Resolution Paving Way for Tax Reform
16 hours ago
Robin replied to Robin's discussion HANNITY: New Evidence Proves Clinton-Russia Collusion
"Panama Papers Reveal Clinton’s Kremlin Connection John and Tony Podesta aren’t fooling…"
21 hours ago
Bruce O'Hara replied to Fundamental Refounding's discussion Trump plans to release JFK Assassination Documents
"I remember that, after the Warren Commission study, the govt stated that all of the files would be…"
yesterday
JeansBrother replied to Fundamental Refounding's discussion Trump plans to release JFK Assassination Documents
"For a government OF the people, BY the people and FOR the people, there are certainly a lot of…"
yesterday
Robin replied to Robin's discussion HANNITY: New Evidence Proves Clinton-Russia Collusion
"Grassley wants 'gag order' lifted for FBI informant allegedly 'threatened' by…"
yesterday
Robin liked Fundamental Refounding's discussion Trump plans to release JFK Assassination Documents
yesterday
Robin replied to Fundamental Refounding's discussion Trump plans to release JFK Assassination Documents
"JW Lawsuit Forced National Archives’ Release of Kennedy Docs A Judicial Watch lawsuit has…"
yesterday
Fundamental Refounding replied to JeansBrother's discussion NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS VOLUME 24, NUMBER 41
"Thank you for posting this. The gun grabbers never stop. Sharing this! "
yesterday
Fundamental Refounding liked JeansBrother's discussion NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS VOLUME 24, NUMBER 41
yesterday
Fundamental Refounding replied to Robin's discussion HANNITY: New Evidence Proves Clinton-Russia Collusion
"Both the House and Senate opened investigations into this Uranium One deal and Muller is in this up…"
yesterday
Fundamental Refounding posted discussions
yesterday
Rick replied to Robin's discussion HANNITY: New Evidence Proves Clinton-Russia Collusion
"Obama DOJ threatened FBI informant if he spoke to congress regarding his knowledge of the Uranium…"
yesterday
JeansBrother posted a discussion
yesterday
JeansBrother replied to Robin's discussion HANNITY: New Evidence Proves Clinton-Russia Collusion
"So, does anyone know what shuts off Mueller's investigation(s)?   When must he quit?"
yesterday

TRAFFIC



© 2017   Fundamental Refounding.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service